@article {Brooks44, author = {Jordan Brooks and Scott Richardson and Zhikai Xu}, title = {(Systematic) Investing in Emerging Market Debt}, volume = {30}, number = {2}, pages = {44--61}, year = {2020}, doi = {10.3905/jfi.2020.1.088}, publisher = {Institutional Investor Journals Umbrella}, abstract = {The authors extend the analysis of systematic investment approaches to emerging market (EM) fixed income. They focus on hard currency bonds issued by emerging sovereign and quasi-sovereign entities. They find that systematic exposures linked to carry, defensive, momentum, and valuation themes are well compensated and lowly correlated in EM markets. A transaction-cost and liquidity aware long-only portfolio generates an information ratio above 1. They further show that an excess of benchmark returns for a broad set of EM managers is (i) largely explained by passive exposures to EM corporate credit excess returns and EM local currency returns, and (ii) has nontrivial macroeconomic exposures (growth, inflation, volatility, and liquidity). A systematic approach to EM debt may be a powerful diversifier.TOPICS: Emerging markets, currencyKey Findings{\textbullet} We find that a systematic approach to active risk taking {\textquotedblleft}works{\textquotedblright} in emerging market (EM) fixed income. Exposures linked to carry, defensive, momentum and valuation themes have been well compensated in EM markets.{\textbullet} We further find that an excess of benchmark returns for incumbent EM managers contains a lot of traditional beta and significant macroeconomic sensitivities.{\textbullet} There is potentially a large diversification benefit for a well-crafted systematic long-only portfolio of EM bonds.}, issn = {1059-8596}, URL = {https://jfi.pm-research.com/content/30/2/44}, eprint = {https://jfi.pm-research.com/content/30/2/44.full.pdf}, journal = {The Journal of Fixed Income} }